Blanchon and Shaw (1995) use drowned coral reefs in the Caribbean-Atlantic region to study ‘glacio-eustatic
sea-level changes’ during the last de-glaciation. They emphasise the benefits of using coral reefs for studying sea
level changes, referring to their suitability for radiometric dating and the way in which they maintain themselves at sea
level through vertical accretion. In particular they investigate Acropora palmata, since it forms monospecific reefs and is strongly depth restricted, meaning
it can be successfully and reliably used to infer the sea level. When sea levels
rise faster than this species can grow vertically the reef will exhibit a mixed
framework with other corals, eventually this is replaced by deep water corals.
An inverse relationship has been uncovered between the rate of sea level rise
and the thickness of this mixed framework layer. Figure 1 presents the sea
level rise that occurred during the last de-glaciation, reconstructed from
drowned reefs. The results indicate the large volumes of meltwater that entered
oceans at three main points in time, and that sea level rise occurred rapidly. However,
it also suggests that reefs were able to form again following the rapid sea
level rise, which is good news considering the threats currently facing these
ecosystems.
A similar study was carried out in Hawaii by Webster et al (2004)
which attempted to investigate the reason for the drowning of the 150m
submerged reef off Hawaii. Through radiometric dating techniques they were able
to place the drowning of this reef at around 14,700 years ago which coincides
with a sea level rise period known as 'Meltwater Pulse 1a'.
The study not only provides evidence for the occurrence and timing of this
meltwater phase, but also the intensity of the sea level rise (approximately
35m in 500 years, equivalent to 40-50mm per year).
Figure 2: Position of drowned reefs in Hawaii. Reef 1 was subject to
reef drowning following Meltwater Phase 1a (Source: Webster et al, 2004).
While the main process under investigation in studies like
these is eustatic sea level rise, an understanding of isostatic changes is required to infer eustatic sea level rise from the assessment of coral
reefs. Stirling et al (1998) highlight the inconsistencies in the inferred timing and duration of the last interglacial as a result of isostatic processes
that vary spatially.
From these studies it is evident that historic sea level
rise caused by de-glaciation following the last glacial maximum caused the
drowning of many coral reefs. However, it is also apparent that coral reefs
were able to recolonize shallow regions of the ocean once sea levels were stable,
which has positive implications for the consequences of present day anthropogenic changes.
No comments:
Post a Comment